MWDAM-1057/1056:
For design results, the actual values for all kind of Z-values which are based on the redesigned surface line 
are corrrected in the new UI.

MWDAM-1057/1056
For design results, the profilename and the profile probability are now always filled.

MWDAM-1057/1056
When performing a calculation, selected but not relevant calculations are now given back in the calcultion log
as not relevant to inform the user. An example of this is when a location is selected with both piping as well
as stability profiles but only a stability calculation is performed. The, for each piping profile a message is
logged to say that this is not relevant. Also, when calculations fail the preparation stage of the calculation
this is logged to inform the user.

MWDAM-1057
The combination of outwards stability and zone areas is no longer allowed.

MWDAM-1161
In Release, when for model BishopUpliftVan an UpliftVan calculation failed for one the location-profile combinations, all the combinations for this location were not calculated with Bishop anymore. In new version all combinations are calculated. When one the calculations fails, the overall result for this combination is the failed one.

MWDAM-1034
The uplift factor for Piping (Bligh, Sellmeijer4Forces and SellmeijerVNK) is different because it was the WTI uplift factor in Dam 15.1.2.24738 (this was noticed while solving issue MWDAM-1034). 

MWDAM-1034
The adjusted PL3/PL4 values in Piping results in Dam 15.1.2.24738 are not 0.0, but those are the values for stability; for piping no adjustment has to be made (this was noticed while solving issue MWDAM-1034). 

MWDAM-1180
The parameter UseNewMinDistanceDikeToeStartDitch is not correctly applied. While testing you have to work around this. To correctly compare with Dam 15.1.2.24738, the parameter should always be set to True (because that is the current behaviour). 

MWDAM-1219
As must be clear from the issue itself, the actual problem is not with the determination of the pl-line 4 but with the determination of the correct scenario (i.e. Hydraulic Shortcut versus No Hydraulic Shortcut). This was due that in the original dam a mistake was made in the determination of the Location With Lowest UpliftFactor. In that old version, it was assumed that eacht surface line (in RD) is given from left to right but never bothered to check this. So, for surface lines running from right to left (as is the case here) this produced a wrong result. In the new (engine) version this mistake has been corrected by the fact that the engine always uses localised surface lines which always run from left to right. So the engine results are the correct results. 
 
MWDAM-1223
When design was made for piping calculations in combination with DTH adaption the Sf piping was set to '1' if crest was adapted to DTH. Now real safety factor is calculated.

MWDAM-1227
As with MWDAM-1219 the real problem is the correct determination of the Location With Lowest UpliftFactor. Old DAM uses (wrongly) global surface line whereas the engine uses the correct localised surface line. The effect here is a different value for xCoordinateLastUpliftPoint which is passed on to the DGSMStabDam.dll which determines the grid.

MWDAM-1238
Piping design calculation with geometry adaption gives wrong safety factor in result in release 15.1.
This issue has been solved, so the safety factors in design calculation with geometry adaption will be different than in the 15.1 release version. The new answers are the correct answers.